So you're probably already aware of
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves
which is an entertaining but ultimately mediocre and hollow movie
with a great soundtrack and a damn entertaining Alan Rickman
performance.
But
also released in 1991 was another Robin Hood
movie. Directed by action veteran John Irvin and written by Sam
Resnick and John McGrath. McGrath was a veteran TV writer but this is
Resnick's only film credit on IMDB. The cast is full of veteran
actors, but the biggest name a modern viewer will recognize is a
young Uma Thurman in her Post-Baron Munchausen,
Pre-Pulp Fiction early
90s period.
Robert
Hode (Patrick Bergin) is the Saxon Earl of Huntington and friend
Norman Baron Roger Dauguerre (Jeroen Krabbe). Things go sour when Sir
Miles Folcanet (Jurgen Prochnow AKA the guy from Das Boot)
arrives and arrogantly starts throwing his weight around. He's here
to marry Dauguerre's niece Marian (Uma Thurman), but that's not why
Robin rebels.
Much
the Miller (Daniel Webb) is caught poaching and Robin stands up for
him, preventing Sir Miles from blinding the peasant. During his
trial, words get heated, pride gets insulted, and Robin punches his
way out of the castle and becomes an outlaw with his kinsman Will
Scarlett (Owen Teale). They hit upon the standard beats of the river
fight with Little John (David Morrissey), the attempted thievery on
Friar Tuck (Jeff Nuttall), Marian running off to join Robin disguised
as a young man. All against the backdrop of Prince John's regency
during King Richard's imprisonment.
So why
is this “The Good 1991 Robin Hood movie?”
Tone.
It
gets the spirit absolutely right. There's no way that an early 90s
medieval movie would ever reach the joyful spirit of The Adventures of Robin Hood, but
while the costumes and sets feature lots of browns and washed out
lighting, the spirit of the movie is deeply earthy. Characters sing
(not elaborate musical numbers, just little ditties as they go
along). There's some swashbuckling. There's trick shooting. There are glimpses of historical awareness, though they
muddle together All Souls' Day with the Lord of Misrule tradition
that belongs to Christmastide or the Merry Men getting powerful Welsh
longbows about a hundred or so years before they became truly
dominant in English battle tactics.
These
are legitimate mistakes, but there's an attempt at verisimilitude and
not something so nakedly absurd as the Ewok Village or Celts or a
Moor traveling the 12th
Century English countryside because he has a Wookiee life-debt like
in Prince of Thieves.
Then
there's the romance. Marian is great here as a strong-willed and very
court-savvy young woman with a sharp tongue. She has no interest in
Sir Miles, and is charmed by Robin's benevolence and hot-blooded
heroics. Even when she goes tomboy, she's still a girl in disguise
and not simply an action movie character with boobs. This Marian's
actually kind of bad in a fight, but still manages to get some good
shots in. Compare with Prince of Thieves Marian who starts off the movie showing off her sword skills but becomes useless in the climactic fight scene.
Robin
himself is great too. There's no “You killed my father/betrayed my
King, I need revenge!” motivation. He's just a proud, hot-headed
nobleman with a rigid sense of morality who commits to his actions.
Not quite Erroll Flynn heroic, but definitely channeling him.
Jeff
Nuttall's Friar Tuck is also interesting. Nuttall was a major figure
in 60s counterculture and artistic movements with an anarchic streak.
Here he plays Tuck as a thoroughly shady character: evicted from his
monastery for murdering another friar, he now travels the countryside
selling chicken bones as saints' relics. Its an interesting thought
behind why a man of God would go around with a band of outlaws, but
Tuck's postmodern shadiness contrasts hard with Robin's
straightforward heroism.
Straightforward
heroism is the order of the day here. Robin is good, Sir Miles is bad
(but not “consorting with sorcery and trying to rape Maid Marian”
bad), and the two spiral toward a deadly confrontation before a
legitimately earned happy ending.
Besides
Men in Tights, this
forgotten little gem is the best Robin Hood movie made in the last
thirty years or so. Highly recommended.
1 comment:
Watch Robin Hood free online on zmovies now. The movie was nice to look at in a "Braveheart" sort of way. But the whole thing seemed like a rehash. Robin's "Merry Men" weren't very merry and I could never figure out if there was supposed to be chemistry between Crowe and Blanchette. There wasn't. I chose the director's cut from the DVD I rented. Each time I had to pause for some reason didn't matter much. The Eleanor of Acquataine character as well as King John were boring as well. I would not have enjoyed this in the theater as there was simply not enough to it. Sean Connery's version is a little better but not much. Stick with Braveheart. It was nice to see William Hurt again although his character was vague as well. See more: Robin Hood cast 2018
Post a Comment