Showing posts with label Stephen King. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen King. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

“It appears we may have a problem of some magnitude.”

Stephen King. Yeah, that’s one name to pay attention to when it comes to horror. When he’s not also writing prison dramas about hope and freedom… Speaking of Shawshank, the director of that movie, Frank Darabont, adapted King’s The Mist for the big screen in 2007. This should be good, right?

Plot
In a small Maine town not too far from Portland, something…happens and a mist descends upon the townsfolk. A group of people in a grocery store end up trapped inside when the fog rolls in and…things try to get in. Actually, it’s a variety of things, and we get a spread of some kind of tentacle monster, giant wasp things, bird things, spider things and more things that try to get inside. Turns out the survivors have found themselves inside a 1950s Monster Movie, where a “What hath SCIENCE done?!” theme gets merged with a “Lord of the Flies” like plot about societal collapse in the face of chaos and some really annoying fundamentalist lady.

Characters
Oh geez, its another one of these “Too many Characters, not enough development” kind of deals.

David Drayton: Thomas Jane is our Hero, an artist with showbiz connections, but he’s also a local to the town and has a son, Billy (played by Nathan Gamble). He doesn’t really like his neighbor, loves his wife and promises his son that the bad things aren’t going to get him. He’s our Point of View character for the disaster as well, and becomes one of the leaders of the survivors (at least until another faction pops up). He’s alright, but the character’s a bit flat.

Brent Norton: Andre Braugher (he was the general in Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer) is David’s neighbor, a lawyer, out-of-towner and black. He & David don’t really get along, but they do bond a little after the storm in the beginning that knocked trees down that crushed David’s boat house and Brent’s Mercedes. After the disaster, he organizes a group to go for help and they’re never heard from again. No, seriously. We don’t find out what happened to them, if they made it or not, though its probably assumed that they got eaten because the one guy who went out at the same time as them and had a rope tied around his waist most certainly did get eaten.

Amanda Dunfrey: Laurie Holden is a local who’s husband is out of town. She more or less becomes a protective figure for Billy Drayton, and is one of David’s faction. She has a generally high opinion of humanity.

Ollie Weeks: Toby Jones plays one of the supervisors in the grocery store and one of the crew who really rises to the occasion, helping organize the survival efforts and generally being competent (and handy with a revolver). He also reminds me of Billy Quizboy from The Venture Brothers show (make of that what you will)

Jim: William Sadler (who’s been in Shawshank and The Green Mile) is a local blue collar Joe who’s disbelief in the things out there early on help get a bagboy killed. Later, he snaps and abandon’s Drayton’s faction for another one. Has a friend named Myron who’s even less developed as a character.

Dan Miller: Jeffrey DeMunn (who was ALSO in Shawshank & The Green Mile) is the last one into the grocery store, having survived an attack by…something during the initial rolling in of the fog. He’s on Drayton’s side the whole time.

Irene Reppler: Frances Sternhagen is an old schoolteacher and generally a badass granny. She calls out the annoying character on her shit and also uses a lighter and a can of insect killer as a makeshift blowtorch. The movie’s badass, easily.

Private Jessup: Sam Witwer is a young army guy who knows a little bit about what the army was doing up at the base (messing around with other dimensions, though its not a surprise by the time we find out).

Sally: Alexa Davalos is a cashier in the store and ostensibly Private Jessup’s love interst, but aside from two scenes together, you could’ve fooled me.

Mrs. Carmody: Marcia Gay Harden is an odd case here. On the one hand, she’s easily the most animated character of the film, chewing scenery and ranting like a crazy person, so its obvious the actress was having fun on set. HOWEVER, she’s also annoying as all hell what with her being a ranting Christian Fundamentalist who is utterly convinced that the mist is a sign of the end times and my God does she turn into a broken record and you just wish someone would put a bullet in her. She ends up forming another faction that challenges Drayton’s ideas, and becomes the Villain, more or less. But she’s not really a good villain because there’s no nuance to the character, nothing to make her sound like a charismatic demagogue that can take advantage of the chaos to spread her ideas. No, she just comes off as a two dimensional, haughty, condescending crazy pants, and I find it incredibly difficult to believe that within two days she could assemble a tremendous following. A week, maybe (if I’m feeling generous) but not two days.

Visuals/Effects
I hope you like gray, because this movie delivers a lifetime supply of it on your doorstep. A wall-to-wall gray fog settles in over the town, and that’s both a tonal strength, I suppose, but also a weakness. On the one hand, sure a solid curtain of gray helps add an oppressive gloom to things, but its not scary by any means. Its not even creepy when compared to the layered fogs that show up in older horror films. You know, the kind that form a three foot blanket across the ground and swirl lazily back and forth. The monsters are generally well done CGI, but they’re all pretty gray as well. Character death scenes are generally brutal and a welcome break from the overall slow visual pace of the rest of the movie, but there’s nothing at all particularly scary about anything going on. I will say that I appreciate the movie’s lack of jump cuts, though. At least it didn’t take the easy way out in that regard.

Writing
Novella by Stephen King and screenplay by Frank Darabont. Not having read the story, I can’t say for sure, but the way everything goes, I’m sure it probably works better on the page than on the screen. On the screen, its just a big boring take on a 50’s monster movie with some heavy handed “social commentary” about societal collapse and demagoguery and so on. Its not fun in a cheesy way, and it didn’t convince me that this was “serious business.” The pacing was glacial, the characters two-dimensional and the dialog was generally forgettable, despite having a pretty decent cast. And as for the twist ending, I won’t spoil it, but I will say that anyone who’s read even a little bit of speculative fiction (sci-fi) short stories won’t be surprised at all. That twist is as common as rocket ships and laser rays in sci-fi short stories.

Sound
The score by Mark Isham is inoffensive and forgettable. There is, however, one song that gets some “serious business” moments near the end, “The Host of Seraphim” sung by Lisa Gerrard and Dead Can Dance as a car is driving away from the grocery store into the fog. The song is basically a woman wailing and coupled with the slowish movement of the scene, just comes off as incredibly cheesy and super serious to the point of absurdity in how I reacted to the music is in the scene with a disbelieving laugh.

Conclusion
I, uh, really didn’t like The Mist. At All. Actually, no, it went past “not like” to “actively dislike.” It’s a boring movie and I called the “What hath SCIENCE done?!” theme really early on (pretty much from the moment I saw military trucks). The ending, while not entirely foreseen, wasn’t a surprise either because, again, similar things happen a lot in these kinds of stories. A real disappointment of a movie, since Darabont's work on The Shawshank Redemption was really, really solid. This…this isn’t a badly made movie by any means, but its just so boring that I can’t even muster an entertaining form of rage to criticize it mercilessly. Now, I have heard that the DVD had a cut of it in black & white, and that probably would’ve helped the movie out a lot, but that’s not the movie that was watched.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

“I understand you’re a man who knows how to get things.”

Every once in a while, I like to expose myself to the Oscar-level drama films. Stuff that is generally accepted as having a message, and is about something important. It helps me justify that impulse monocle purchase of a few years ago, because I’m classy. Don’t know why I started that off as a lead in to saying that I saw 1994’s The Shawshank Redemption for the first time recently. Going in, I knew two things: it was based on a Stephen King story, and it was about prison.



Plot
Well, its definitely about prison. Shawshank Reformatory, to be exact. A young New England banker is sentenced to life in Shawshank for the murder of his wife. He spends the next twenty years adjusting to life on the inside, interacting with the other inmates and changing peoples’ lives. Oh yeah, and it’s a period film that takes place over several decades (it is 142 minutes long)

CharactersAndy Dufresne: Our hero, played by Tim Robbins. A whiz with money, he endures his prison term with stoicism, confident in his innocence. He starts up little hobbies, like carving a chess set, or setting up a library for the inmates, or helping the guards with their income tax forms, or trying to avoid prison sodomy. Andy’s whole arc is about how a guy like him can not only survive in prison, but also take advantage of things so as to more or less thrive. He’s a persistent, doggedly patient man, and seems determined to bring a little culture into the big house. Of course, there’s more to his serene patience than he lets on, and by the end of the film, you realize just how much of a magnificent bastard of an intellectual badass he is.


“Red” Redding: Morgan Freeman is the narrator, a long-time resident of Shawshank who’s got quite a successful smuggling racket going on, providing goods at negotiable rates. He’s sly and knows how life is on the inside, and eventually becomes Andy’s best friend. He actually gets a very real character arc as Andy keeps prodding him to feel hope.


Warden Norton: The (generally) soft spoken warden of Shawshank who says “Put your trust in the Lord; your ass belongs to me.” He’s a quietly threatening presence, but favorable to those on his good side. He and Andy get an interesting dynamic going when he discovers Dufresne is quite the number cruncher, but near the end of the movie, the warden gets into a weird twist where he suddenly becomes truly eeeeeeviiiiilll for no clear reason. He was a hardass before, but he becomes a real asshole, and I never picked up on “why” exactly.


Captain Hadley: Warden Norton’s dragon (look it up on tvtropes), he’s the muscle of the guards, a balled up fist in a metal gauntlet holding a granite fist broken off of a very large statue. He’s a mean bastard who’s not above beating the shit out of the inmates when they get out of line, but he can be reasoned with, as Andy finds out. This leads to a hilariously badass moment when he confronts an inmate named Boggs in his cell. Interestingly enough, he’s played by Clancy Brown, a veteran voice actor and the man behind the Superman: The Animated Series’ Lex Luthor.


Tommy: A young delinquent with a small role, he has an arc where he gets taken in under Andy’s wing so he can study for the GED exam. He’s a likable guy but not in the movie for long.


Brooks: An “institutionalized” man and the guy who ran the prison library when Andy got there. His major arc was the sad tale of his life after being released from prison and unable to adjust to life on the outside.

Visuals (Direction/Effects)
Filmed on location at the Mansfield Reformatory and other places in Ohio, director Frank Darabont did an excellent job capturing not only the grim mood of prison, but also the period feel. Hell, watching it, I thought the movie was made back in the 80s and not the early 90s. In terms of fantastic shots, the one iconic shot of Andy in the rain that gets used for every clip about the movie stands out. The context of that is, of course, spoilerific, but it’s a great moment.

The pacing of the film is slow, which is understandable, considering the length of time Andy spends there. The payoff near the end is completely worth the wait, though I have to admit I was getting a little antsy in places wishing the plot would stop shuffling its feet.

Writing
Based on a Stephen King short story and adapted by veteran scriptwriter (and director) Frank Darabont. Both of those men can write very, very well. In a drama, characterization is the crux of the story, and it abounds in spades. Just about anybody with an important supporting role gets some kind of arc, and the overall story gently nudges the audience into thinking that hope isn’t really such a bad thing. It could have been shoved down the audience’s throat, but the film doesn’t really get hamfisted about it very often. I appreciate its respect for my intelligence. Oh yes, and the dialog is much sharper and wittier than I expected.


Then there is the payoff, which is so brilliantly set up and perfectly well-earned by Andy that you can’t help but laugh all the way through it. However, and this is entirely my own opinion, the story seems to lose a lot of steam after the payoff scene. I don’t know, maybe I just feel that way because the payoff was so brilliantly and intellectually delicious that I felt like it should’ve been time to drop the curtain and roll the credits.

Sound
Its been a few weeks now, but the movie has a score and a number of period songs that work well. Aside from that, nothing else to report.

Conclusion
The Shawshank Redemption is a very good movie that deserves its accolades. Oddly enough, it was nominated for several Oscars, but never won. It’s a great movie with fantastic characterization and dialog. A slow burn of a plot, but it rewards the audience’s patience. Yeah. I can recommend it with confidence.