This has been on my mind for a while
now, but The Last Jedi and a lot of people's visceral reaction
against it, helped crystallize this line of thought.
The Last Jedi, in an attempt to be dark
and serious, and “different”, hates heroism and actively punishes
it. Poe Dameron, hotshot fighter pilot, is the only truly heroic
character in the film. He's the only one who consistently, and
without hesitation puts his life on the line for the cause and makes
hard, decisive command decisions in stressful times aimed at
protecting lives. He is constantly punished for this. By other
characters, by plot twists, by supremely horrid writing.
He is a classic Capital-H Hero. He's
not conflicted about doing the right thing. He's not dripping with
parental angst. He's not considering turning into a villain. He's a
true blue, dyed-in-the-wool Hero. Even with dumb, quippy dialogue, he's got a natural charisma that shines through the poor writing that makes you want to follow him into ADVENTURE.
And the movie shits on him. It does
everything it can to not let him be a hero. To beat his heroic
impulses out of him. To make him submissive to the plot because “its
the dark middle chapter of the trilogy.” Because a Space Opera
about space wizards with laser swords demands gritty realism about
the horrors of war.
This is not unique to The Last Jedi.
Superman in particular has suffered a lot from this in movies. Henry
Cavill cuts a heroic figure and has the physique, smile, and natural
earnestness to pull off Clark Kent. He spends the bulk of Man of
Steel wanting to use his powers
for the good of his adopted planet, but is repeatedly told no by his
adopted father, the very man who should be nurturing him to use his
abilities wisely. This carries through into Batman vs
Superman, where Superman is more
feared than Batman by the world at large, and the plot manipulates
him into fighting Batman. Yet again, Cavill seems to want to play
Superman at his full heroic glory, but the movie won't let him. I
haven't seen Justice League,
and don't plan to, so I can't comment on him there.
This goes back at least as far as
Superman Returns, from 2006.
There, Brandon Routh was cast as a next-generation Christopher
Reeves. Tall, handsome, and with a comforting smile. The actor looks
the part of Superman. But what do we have? A Superman who abandoned
Earth for years. A Superman who abandoned Lois
for years, leaving her to raise a son without him. The movie has
flashes of Superman. He saves a jet in a genuinely thrilling
sequence. He cleans up the local crooks with aplomb and rescues
people left and right. Yet the movie bogs itself down in half-assed
navel gazing and doubt while a deliciously evil Lex Luthor (played to
perfection by Kevin Spacey before we realized he might actually be
very evil in real life) executes his plot.
To get
a good Superman movie, I'd argue that you have to go back to Superman
and Superman II from the late 70s-early 80s. And even then, I
recommend the Richard Donner Cut of Superman II over the theatrical.
Superman III sucks and is boring, while Superman IV is a hilarious
trainwreck. Those movies let Superman be Superman: Bright, heroic,
hopeful, inspirational, and reassuring. The world is a better place
simply by having Superman in it.
For
some reason, the movers and shakers of entertainment have decided
that audiences don't want straightforward heroes anymore. Antiheroes
are pushed as the best option, since they're conflicted and dark, and
that's realism,
because real people are flawed and don't always do the right thing.
Straightforward heroes, if they show up, have to be defeated by cynical
villains who aren't dumb enough to play fair. Or they have to be
treated as jokes. Buffoons to be laughed at for their outdated idealism.
Deconstruction
is fine in measured doses, because you can learn a lot about stories
and storytelling by taking the pieces apart. However, if you don't
put the pieces back together, you're left with a mess. When you
deconstruct everything, you have nothing left except a dull expanse
of broken ideas and characters. There's nothing to take away from
that kind of entertainment landscape but nihilism.
All
your heroes are broken lunatics and there is no truth to
storytelling. That's the lesson from deconstructionism for its own
sake.
Batman
needs to be moody and anti-social at all times. Green Lantern needs
to be indecisive. Luke Skywalker needs to be a fallen hero who ran
away from the galaxy's conflicts in out-of-character cowardice.
This
is what major movies tell us, and is it any wonder why all of the
major entertainment franchises are tottering on the brink of
collapse? Audiences are drifting away because they no longer satisfy
them.
A
large part of the reason why Wonder Woman exceeded all expectations
was because she was allowed to be Wonder Woman: Warrior princess,
peacebringer, avenger of injustice, and Hero. Not only that, but
Steve Trevor was equally as Heroic, which made their relationship all
the more enjoyable.
The
Marvel movies have also delivered on that kind of storytelling.
Captain America is recognizably Heroic in his movies, though the MCU
is getting long in the teeth now, and even with the acquisition of
FOX, I don't know how audiences are going to react past Infinity War.
Audiences
are sick of nothing but gray antiheroics. They're also sick of
retreads of familiar, recent stories only with darker tones. People
are starving for true Heroics in their stories again.
Wonder
Woman's success was not a fluke, but a sign of what's coming. The
unbridled love for My Hero Academia is a sign of what's coming. The
interest in Pulp literature from the early 20th
century is a sign of what's coming. The renewed interest in classic
superhero comics that look nothing like the spiteful mess modern
comics are is a sign of what's coming. The quietly whispered question
“whatever happened to Westerns?” is a sign of what's coming.
Mark
my words:
The White Hat Heroes are coming back.
1 comment:
Now this is an insightful review. Excellent points and it makes sense.
Post a Comment